ARTS 2874 (Year 2 Sociology
‘If human being imposes such wonderful sacrifices not just on guy’s sexuality but on his aggressivity, we can understand far better why it is tough for him to be delighted in that world. As a matter of fact, primitive male was far better off in understanding no limitations of reaction. For this, his prospects of appreciating this happiness for any size of time were very slim. Civilized male has actually exchanged a part of his possibilities of joy for a section of safety and security’ (Freud 1930, p. 115
Via the methods which power operates within the Social, ‘o btaining a part of safety and security commonly requires a shared exchange; that is the suppression/ repression of one’s real nature. Foucault’s understanding of ‘docile bodies’, in which sustain the normalisation of human behavior, thereby highlights the differing relations of power imposed upon individuals, strengthening the “status”. However, by managing passive bodies with applying control and dependence, we become confined to the oppressive frameworks of corrective techniques for the prevalent battle for joy.
As a result, the need of consistency therefore triggers the emergence of constructed efficiencies, highlighting what Goffman structures as the “discussion of self”. It is because of that Goffman says his concept of dramaturgy, assuming our social experiences of communication to that of stars on stage– we also change our behavior and performance depending upon the problems and lodged social roles “anticipated” people.
Utilising an intersectional lens, being a social work major, I check out the notion of “social actors”– and its importance and application– in regards to marginalised populaces, especially within the context of the neurodivergent population, acknowledging their boosted sensitivity to feelings of discontent. Although discontent regularly presents as an overarching familiar feeling main to the human experience, Freud stresses’ constraints to taking pleasure in joy, for civilisation needs of excellent sacrifices’ The application of these understandings can therefore be observed through the example of masking; the technique of hiding/ suppressing neurodivergent characteristics or conditions to fit the mould of what is considered “normative behaviour”, ultimately leading to substantial repercussions such as exhaustion.
Furthermore, upon considering the recent rise of modern innovations throughout daily life, the stress to “do” in accordance with the collective, more connections right into the social construct of sex, notifying the discussion to perform gender “properly”. The oppressive patriarchal society maintained, together with the considerable shift of technological modernity, has actually therefore added to the common nature of surveillance, reinforcing social sex duties and gendering bodies.
Likewise, Butler offers the notion of sex performativity, stressing that our collective understanding of “gender identity” remains rooted in what we take into consideration and create as gendered acts with found out socialised practices, subsequently producing the social sex binary. While it can be kept in mind that bodies both shape and are formed by technical advancements, the exploitation of marginalised bodies– particularly queer and non normative bodies, shows and boosts the repeating gender inequalities of leading class structure. The influence of this thus demands the large-cost sacrifice of credibility and identity,’ exchanging a portion of happiness for a section of safety and security , for that is the price to exist within civilisation.
Unhappiness, as a result, functions as a seemingly relentless feeling throughout the human experience, therefore the oppressive system we exist within and the contributing connections of power and benefit suffering hegemony.